选择哪里的Linode机房？Fremont还是Dallas？

Linode 各机房速度测试

This topic created in 5038 days ago, the information mentioned may be changed or developed.

以前听说Tokyo机房离国内近访问速度快，但是这段时间的实际使用发现并不是这个样子，尤其是晚上的时候ping丢包率超高（浙江电信）。网上看到说Fremont和Dallas的机房速度还不错，如何选择呢？

当前时段的Ping测试结果如下，感觉Fremont是最好的。

--- speedtest.fremont.linode.com ping statistics ---
101 packets transmitted, 99 received, 1% packet loss, time 100092ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 200.931/289.079/383.836/56.448 ms

--- speedtest.dallas.linode.com ping statistics ---
101 packets transmitted, 76 received, 24% packet loss, time 100190ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 322.877/344.391/400.404/11.157 ms

--- speedtest.tokyo.linode.com ping statistics ---
103 packets transmitted, 59 received, 42% packet loss, time 102369ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 174.843/313.745/454.385/78.656 ms

ping

transmitted

Time

14 replies • 1970-01-01 08:00:00 +08:00

eric_q

Aug 22, 2012

浙江电信的话，还是 Fremont 吧。

reus

Aug 22, 2012

我这里到日本linode也超级慢，ssh经常掉线，今天停用了换到photonvps

neildd

Aug 22, 2012

我上次换过Dallas的，速度很不理想。

citydog

Aug 22, 2012

东京现在对联通比较理想，电信很一般；fremont也跟东京的情况差不多，但整体比东京稍好；达拉斯，万年不变的一般性网速，但比较稳定，万年不变的稳定，哈哈~~ newark和伦敦就算了，不在大陆考虑的范围内~~

yesmeck

Aug 22, 2012

这几天日本的 ssh 连上去慢的根本无法操作。

alvin2ye

Aug 22, 2012

Fremont 完胜

rhwood

Aug 23, 2012

fremont dallas tokyo全都试过。fremont和tokyo的稳定性达不到要求，现在长期用dallas了，几个月才让你惦记一回，平时不怎么理——但是只把dallas作为后端。

infong

Aug 23, 2012

东京不要考虑就是了。
大陆沿海的话 Fremont > Dallas > Tokyo

new_bee

Aug 23, 2012

London速度如何呢？

lopakaka

Aug 23, 2012

Fremont

jylee

Aug 23, 2012

明显的Fremont，速度快
dallas延迟高，但是稳定

lifanxi

Aug 23, 2012

Fremont快于Dallas，但Dallas比Fremont稳定。
我用Dallas。

SAGAN

Aug 25, 2012

我现在用Tokyo的. 联通3G访问速度非常好, 比以前用的Fremont快很多.

电信宽带的话, 貌似我这里几个Linode机房速度都不理想. 延迟最短的貌似还是东京.

这是我家里电信ping linode几个机房的结果. (江苏南京)

C:\Users\sagan>ping speedtest.fremont.linode.com

Pinging speedtest.fremont.linode.com [50.116.14.9] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 50.116.14.9: bytes=32 time=600ms TTL=54
Reply from 50.116.14.9: bytes=32 time=584ms TTL=54
Reply from 50.116.14.9: bytes=32 time=588ms TTL=54
Reply from 50.116.14.9: bytes=32 time=608ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 50.116.14.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 584ms, Maximum = 608ms, Average = 595ms

C:\Users\sagan>ping speedtest.dallas.linode.com

Pinging speedtest.dallas.linode.com [50.116.25.154] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 50.116.25.154: bytes=32 time=668ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.116.25.154: bytes=32 time=632ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.116.25.154: bytes=32 time=642ms TTL=48
Reply from 50.116.25.154: bytes=32 time=644ms TTL=48

Ping statistics for 50.116.25.154:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 632ms, Maximum = 668ms, Average = 646ms

C:\Users\sagan>ping speedtest.atlanta.linode.com

Pinging speedtest.atlanta.linode.com [50.116.39.117] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 50.116.39.117: bytes=32 time=654ms TTL=54
Reply from 50.116.39.117: bytes=32 time=656ms TTL=54
Reply from 50.116.39.117: bytes=32 time=641ms TTL=54
Reply from 50.116.39.117: bytes=32 time=655ms TTL=54

Ping statistics for 50.116.39.117:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 641ms, Maximum = 656ms, Average = 651ms

C:\Users\sagan>ping speedtest.tokyo.linode.com

Pinging speedtest.tokyo.linode.com [106.187.96.148] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 106.187.96.148: bytes=32 time=504ms TTL=61
Reply from 106.187.96.148: bytes=32 time=496ms TTL=61
Reply from 106.187.96.148: bytes=32 time=491ms TTL=61
Reply from 106.187.96.148: bytes=32 time=492ms TTL=61

Ping statistics for 106.187.96.148:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 491ms, Maximum = 504ms, Average = 495ms

alex3

Jul 15, 2013

我选了fremont的，刚开始是ip被封的，只好删除了，重新买了一个，还好可以用，但跟我以前买的一个还是要差点，以前的已经被我几个星期前删除了。现在这个全国ping发现多数地方都是超过200ms的。有兴趣的可以访问试试：http://www.hostbus.co